Some Outstanding Ideas For Dissertation Topics On Procurement
Procurement is the process in which a government body or organization provides goods or services by way of an independent contractor who specializes in the area. There are vast topics to cover in procurement, making the subject ideal for dissertation topics. Here are some great ideas to work with:
- Should procurement awards consider vendors equally?
- Should procurement awards be transparent or is this just a waste?
- What are the most effective ways to win awards?
- What penalties should exist in procurement malpractice?
- Are there alternative forms to providing services to people?
- Should procurement awards be centralized?
- Should procurement awards be more diversified?
- How do societies lose out with poorly written awards?
Some awards are specifically designed with the intention of providing a large amount of goods and services for a large number of people. But this means that the awards don’t really apply to smaller vendors. Should the awards be broken up to level the playing field.
Some people believe that there exists plenty of wasted funds in procurement awards. Because of this there have been great efforts made to make awards more transparent. Opponents of this say that the process of being transparent is in and of itself a waste.
Since governments began awarding procurement contracts to private vendors there have been countless approaches to win awards. Are some more effective than others? And if there are then why don’t more vendors follow these methods?
If an awardee is found to have provided an award without going through the proper channels or making it fair for competitors, should they be held responsible with more strict penalties? Who suffers the most from these malpractices? The people or the vendors who lost contracts?
Is procurement the most efficient way of providing goods and services to people or are there alternative approaches that should be explored? Who will suffer the most if services are provided directly rather than through a government entity?
If procurements were centralized then it stands to reason there would be less red tape and awards would be handled more efficiently. However, there is also a concern that a centralized system opens up itself to malpractice. What can be said in support or in disapproval of such a system?
Some countries openly set aside awards for various sub-sections of their community, often for minorities or socio-economically challenged groups. But some will say that this favoritism is a reverse form of promoting diversity since it keeps out many vendors who don’t fall into those categories.
Awards can sometimes be extremely complicated and as a result ineffective in providing the goods and services it promises. This usually leads to a modified award or a new award altogether, thus costing taxpayers more money. How loses the most in these cases?